Alexander Kitaev wrote:
> I didn't try this particular checkout operation, probably it fails as
> you've described, but general operations like
> update/commit/revert/diff etc. works well for me. I'm using Subclipse
> 0.9.34.2, may be this matters?
It could be just too big project or it somehow hit into memory or
concurrency issues in Subclipse. I've tried version from the trunk with
the same result.
By the way, what is this 0.9.34.2 version? The update site at
http://subclipse.tigris.org/update/site.xml only has 0.9.34 version.
regards,
Eugene
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Eugene Kuleshov [mailto:eu@md.pp.ru]
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 08, 2005 19:19
> *To:* users@subclipse.tigris.org
> *Subject:* Re: Again problems with renaming package
>
> Alexander Kitaev wrote:
>
>> I'm using Subclipse with Eclipse 3.2M2, no problems so far..
>
> Hmm. I'm getting endless NPE on checkout from apache svn
> repository. Basically it kills Eclipse.
> See more details at
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=395
>
> regards,
> Eugene
>
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Eugene Kuleshov [mailto:eu@md.pp.ru]
>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 08, 2005 04:29
>> *To:* users@subclipse.tigris.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Again problems with renaming package
>>
>> Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>>>>Indeed, but this _is_ an Eclipse bug right? It should refactor all its
>>>>subpackages as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I do not know. Perhaps someone else can comment. I have only used the
>>>feature for real a couple of times over several years. The logical thing
>>>to do would be to try it on a test project that is not connected to a Team
>>>Provider. Perhaps something about Subclipse causes it to behave
>>>differently? I agree that it seems odd.
>>>
>>>
>> Already supported in 3.2M2. See here
>> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.2M2-200509231000/eclipse-news-all-M2.html
>>
>> Unfortunately Subclipse does not work on 3.2M2 (something
>> wrong with decorators). :-(
>>
>> regards,
>> Eugene
>>
>>
>
Received on Sun Oct 9 03:51:39 2005