Re: Subclipse 0.9.31 with Rational Software Architect

Dan North <dan@tastapod.com> wrote on 07/18/2005 01:49:20 PM:

> This one is close to my heart too, since I am introducing
subversion/subclipse
> to a large team using IBM RAD (Rational Something Something), which is
based
> on the 3.0.x Eclipse code base.
>
> Mark: I appreciate the effort you're going to to keep subclipse
compatible
> with the 3.0 and 3.1 APIs. All I can say is please, please keep it so ;)

I have the same requirements so don't worry. At a minimum, I think we
need to support 3.0 until we get a 1.0 release out there. Then, if there
are really compelling reasons to move to 3.1 we can make a 1.0.x branch
for Eclipse 3.0 so that we can backport important fixes.

The only reason I can think of for moving to Eclipse 3.1 is to use some of
the new SWT features that are available. Anything else can probably be
done compatibly with 3.0.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Received on Tue Jul 19 03:55:33 2005