[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subclipse vs. built-in cvs client

From: Bill Wohler <wohler_at_newt.com>
Date: 2005-03-09 17:40:31 CET

Mark Phippard <MarkP@softlanding.com> writes:

> There is a 100% Java alternative you can try as well. You download it
> here:
>
> http://tmate.org/svn/subclipse.html
>
> It removes the burden of having to get JavaHL installed, and offers good
> performance. That being said, it also brings is own stability issues to
> the table. Most people seem to be having good success with it though.

And I might add, the author has an uncanny ability to fix problems you
find overnight.

-- 
Bill Wohler <wohler_at_newt.com>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
Received on Thu Mar 10 03:40:31 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.