Would this lib that you are working on also make it so that javahl would
not be needed for SVNANT ?
>Hi,
>
>I have seen a lot of problems with dlls and shared libraries and I think a
>100% Java solution is the right way (the same is true for the CVS plugin).
>
>Zsolt
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alexander Kitaev [mailto:alex@tmate.org]
>>Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 9:30 PM
>>To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
>>Subject: Using pure java svn library instead of javahl?
>>
>>
>>Hello All,
>>
>>What do you think about making subclipse use pure java svn client library
>>instead of javahl?
>>
>>I'm asking because I'm developing one (library) and it is already
>>able to do
>>the basic svn operations, both on the working copies and directly on
>>repository. It is also possible and not complex at all to make the library
>>work with eclipse IResources objects instead of java.io.File to
>>access file
>>system.
>>
>>Library development is not finished yet, but I suppose the more users it
>>will have the faster it will progress.
>>
>>I do think that making use of pure java library instead of javahl
>>will make
>>subclipse better (i.e. portable and may be faster), and probably even will
>>allow to implement more interesting features, because the library I'm
>>working on provides richer API then javahl bindings.
>>
>>You may take a look at the library at http://tmate.org/svn/
>>I'll be glad to hear your opinions!
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Alexander Kitaev.
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
>
>
>
--
Stephen P Rufle
srufle@salmonllc.com
H:480-802-7173
Yahoo IM: stephen_rufle
AOL IM: stephen0rufle
Received on Sun Oct 17 04:42:58 2004