>Hello All,
>
>What do you think about making subclipse use pure java svn client library
>instead of javahl?
>
>I'm asking because I'm developing one (library) and it is already able to do
>the basic svn operations, both on the working copies and directly on
>repository. It is also possible and not complex at all to make the library
>work with eclipse IResources objects instead of java.io.File to access file
>system.
>
>Library development is not finished yet, but I suppose the more users it
>will have the faster it will progress.
>
>I do think that making use of pure java library instead of javahl will make
>subclipse better (i.e. portable and may be faster), and probably even will
>allow to implement more interesting features, because the library I'm
>working on provides richer API then javahl bindings.
>
>You may take a look at the library at http://tmate.org/svn/
>I'll be glad to hear your opinions!
>
>
>
>
Yes we would be happy to use your library. Actually, subclipse uses
svnClientAdapter which supports both javahl and command line interface.
SvnClientAdapter can probably adapt to your library too.
I did not try your library yet but you we are really interested !
Cédric
Received on Sat Oct 16 07:10:25 2004