[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Stability issues

From: Jim Myers <myersjj_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: 2004-09-30 22:40:42 CEST

Very NICE/FAST! Thanks!

Jim Myers
IBM Almaden Research Center
Home Office: +1.530.872.8444
Cell: +1.530.570.9144
B3-239: +1.408.927.2013

Cédric Chabanois <cchabanois@no-log.org> wrote on 09/30/2004 02:33:43 PM:

> I just corrected a bug on javahl and that should have improved
> decorating speed I think.
>
> Can someone try to get
> http://svn.collab.
> net/repos/subclipse/branches/subclipse-3/core/svnClientAdapter.jar
> and copy it to its plugins\tigris.subversion.subclipse.core_0.9.21 and
> tell us if it is faster now.
> (use javahl and set "compute deep outgoing state for folders" option)
>
> Cédric
>
> >I am working on decorating. I hope I will correct this issue soon.
> >
> >Cédric
> >
> >
> >"Labanca, Rick" <rick.labanca@studentuniverse.com> a écrit dans le
message
> >de
>
>news:66EEBBD3485BB84C90CFA900A0A96E5501756C8A@sumail03.studentuniverse.com...
> >
> >Ok, project size may be it. Same here, 100% load. I will try verbose,
I'm
> >pretty sure it's the decorating, since it seems to finish drawing
> >decorations just as it settles down.
> >I'm pretty sure it's more to fix it that just copying the technique the
cvs
> >code does for decorating, but sure will be nice if it could get up to
that
> >speed.
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: v.vandenschrick@finmatica.com
> >>[mailto:v.vandenschrick@finmatica.com]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 4:05 AM
> >>To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
> >>Subject: RE: Stability issues
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi Rick,
> >>I'm also trying to use subclipse on large java projects
> >>(5000+ classes).
> >>On much older releases, there were really huge performance problems as
> >>far as decorations were concerned (even with "deep..." decorations
> >>unchecked). There were a major improvement a few realease ago when
> >>decorations were supposed to be computed only when the user made the
> >>nodes visible. But even with 0.9.21 I still experience performance
> >>problems on eclipse startup (sometimes decorating few minutes with
> >>50-100% CPU load even though there should be only the projects root
> >>nodes to decorate...). This is still though much better than
> >>before when
> >>the PC was freezed 5-10 minutes at 100% CPU load.
> >>I still experience problems when performing updates on the
> >>whole project
> >>(and this is still linked to decoration).
> >>One way to diagnose what's eating eclipse's time is to turn
> >>on "verbose"
> >>on the progress view. This way, you can correlate your slowdowns with
> >>the decoration task running.
> >>
> >>As you do, I hope these perf problems will be solved in
> >>future versions
> >>ince this is really a showstoper. Other than that subclipse is a great
> >>svn integration !
> >>BTW, I never experienced such decoration perf problem with
> >>any other SCM
> >>plugin (VSS, CVS).
> >>
> >>Best regards,
> >>
> >>Vincent
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>>De : Labanca, Rick [mailto:rick.labanca@studentuniverse.com]
> >>>Envoyé : mardi 28 septembre 2004 19:50
> >>>À : users@subclipse.tigris.org
> >>>Objet : Stability issues
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>We really want to use subclipse, it's not easy losing integration in
> >>>eclipse once you're used to it!
> >>>
> >>>But for me and a few others, we've had all kinds of issues.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I checked
> >>
> >>
> >>>out the list archives etc and didn't see much mention of
> >>>
> >>>
> >>performance.
> >>
> >>
> >>>I switched off the recursive markup and even then all of
> >>>
> >>>
> >>eclipse will
> >>
> >>
> >>>slow way down from time to time, and sometimes other non subversion
> >>>operations show a message saying something in the background
> >>>is running.
> >>>
> >>>I wish I could be more specific as to why this happens, I
> >>>
> >>>
> >>will try the
> >>
> >>
> >>>new .21 and see. I've also tried setting it to use the
> >>>command line but
> >>>no difference there either.
> >>>
> >>>I hope eventually the recursive markup will be fast (I have hope for
> >>>that since the cvs stuf can do it quickly) but right now it's
> >>>the speed
> >>>and occasionally hangs that are getting me. Anyone else with
> >>>suggestions?
> >>>Rick
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
Received on Fri Oct 1 06:40:42 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.