Re: libdb42.dll missing

>as the packager, you have my vote for removing javahl-win32 fragment.
>un/fortunately, as a non-win32 person, i don't feel in a position to
>yank it out without the other win32 developers' votes.
>
>cchabanois? pkorros?
>
>
>

I don't suggest we remove it entirely, just the external dependencies.
I found that with svn correctly installed they were not required.
infact, the following piece of code can be removed from svnClientAdapter:
                if( "win32".equals(os) ) {
                    System.loadLibrary("libapr");
                    System.loadLibrary("libapriconv");
                    System.loadLibrary("libeay32");
                    System.loadLibrary("libdb42");
                    System.loadLibrary("ssleay32");
                    System.loadLibrary("libaprutil");
                }

I don't think it is unreasonable to force people to install subversion.
However, I am sure end users may disagree :)
Received on Sun Sep 5 11:20:17 2004