[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Re: 0.9.16 still broken

From: Stephen Kestle <Stephen.Kestle_at_orionhealth.com>
Date: 2004-08-30 04:57:24 CEST

You're not quite getting me. I'm not so interested in the What anymore,
so much as the How. I only joined this list when I had problems - I
quickly found out about the share projects issue.

My concern is that there is no easy way to determine what is in an
update by visiting the subclipse site. I thought it was standard
procedure to create a Changes_for_0.9.16 file or something so that
people can see whether they want to download the update or not.

Case in point: I will be unsubscribing from this list as soon as this
installation issue is addressed (whatever that will be). I will still
be in the dark about changes when I do this.

-----Original Message-----
From: McClain Looney [mailto:mlooney@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 30 August 2004 2:49 p.m.
To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Re: 0.9.16 still broken

9.14-16 were supposed to fix the "can't share new projects issue"
that's been talked about lately. that was the reason we rolled it
anyway. sync still isn't done. if the "can't share new projects
issue" wasn't biting you, then no, it isn't a major new version. that
and the upgrade to svn 1.1 javahl.

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:29:52 +1200, Stephen Kestle
<stephen.kestle@orionhealth.com> wrote:
> But isn't there a file list somewhere on a server that details changes
> for each version (and says "no new features but here's the fixes and
few
> tweaks, just so you know")
>
> At least then I can say to my team "This update is more trouble that
> it's worth"... :) Ok, perhaps: "This update is not a compelling
upgrade
> - we'll wait till .17"
>
> Cheers
>
> Stephen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McClain Looney [mailto:mlooney@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 30 August 2004 2:24 p.m.
> To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: 0.9.16 still broken
>
> We're still working out what we should do about the new libapr
> problems. until then, brockj's workaround should do the trick.
>
> as for the changelog, where's your sense of mystery?
>
> seriously, to my knowledge, no new features have been added, just
> fixes and a few tweaks to existing functionality. perhaps
> brockj,pkorros or cchabanois can comment if i'm forgetting something..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stephen Kestle <stephen.kestle@orionhealth.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:23:38 +1200
> Subject: 0.9.16 still broken
> To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
>
> Hi, I was quite happy when subversion had advanced 3 sub-sub versions
> since last week!
>
> But after I had problems with libapr.dll, I searched the list.
>
> I presume that .16 was meant to fix this from .15, but it doesn't.
> Don't we even get an announcement to say that .16 is out?
>
> Also, w-here's the change log for the versions? It'd be nice to know
> what versioning features are now available.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stephen
>
> --
> McClain Looney
> m@loonsoft.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>

-- 
McClain Looney
m@loonsoft.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 30 12:57:24 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.