Re: 0.9.15 Disaster

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:00:49 -0400, Denis Haskin
<denis@haskinferguson.net> wrote:
> Can you clarify (or point me to something that would clarify) what is
> meant by "issues which can probably be fixed by not shipping the native
> bits..."?

I think the win32 issues may be caused by a change in the win32 javahl
builds (i.e. they don't sound too static given the errors about
missing libapr). if we dropped the javahl plugin and relied on the
user to get javahl themselves, this wouldn't be an issue. I can't
verify this though (no windows here).

> So for me as a win32 user, what I think I hear you recommending is to
> install subversion 1.1rc2 and subclipse 0.9.16 (pending the answer to
> the question above)?

Yup. For now, we are still shipping the win32 dlls.

-- 
McClain Looney
m@loonsoft.com