Hi McClain,
I have been using subclipse with Eclipse 3.0 for a while, though it is
not perfect but it sure gets the most of the thing done. Thanks for the
great plugin :) I can understand the complexity involve in developing
subclipse when you need to tackle the eclipse platform apis, the
implementing of a subversion client and also take care of the
challenges introduced by other plugins e.g. Refactor .
I have a question which may have been asked before, i wonder why
subclipse chose to implement as a subversion client from ground up and
not as a facade to a pre-installed command line subversion client ?
Thanks once again for the great plugin.
Regards.
chung-onn
On 1 Jul 04, at 9:19 PM, McClain Looney wrote:
> Eclipse 3.0 has been released as you all know, meaning many more of
> you will be trying the subclipse-3 branch code (the stuff from the
> loonsoft update site). Please bear in mind that the subclipse-3 code
> is INCOMPLETE at this time. Specifically, compare and synchronize (in
> all forms) are not implemented (and haven't ever been since M8). The
> implementation of these functions is very definitely at the top of our
> list of things to do.
>
> If you are wondering what's taking so long, take a look at the eclipse
> cvs plugin implementation... it's enormously complicated.
> Additionally, the synch/compare isv documentation was not completed
> until eclipse 3.0 final (and in fact some of the more interesting
> placeholder sections were excised completely in the final release).
>
> In short, we know subclipse-3 isn't all there yet. Just sit tight,
> it's being worked on.
>
> p.s. patches are welcome :)
>
> ---
> McClain Looney
> m@loonsoft.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Sun Jul 4 17:52:26 2004