[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of Subclipse

From: Cédric Chabanois <cchabanois_at_no-log.org>
Date: 2004-04-16 00:09:31 CEST

Jürgen Baier wrote:

> Hi,
> McClain Looney wrote:
>> On Apr 14, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Jürgen Baier wrote:
>>> 1) When could I expect merge support? 6 Months? 1 Year?
>> i can only speak to the 3.0 branch, but merge/compare support there
>> (in the api merge and compare are joined at the hip), will not exist
>> until some time after the developer documentation is finished
>> (currently the docs are about a third done).
>> as always, patches are welcome :)
> I really hope I can spend some time on the sources in a few weeks. But
> I doubt it ... ;-)
>> the website is out of date, i believe latest windows builds are on
>> 1.0, linux/osx is up to 1.0.1. I make 3.0 releases quite regularly,
>> and try to track svn releases closely.
> Ah. I didn't see the "Documents & Files" section of the website. It
> seems the last build for Eclipse 2.1 is 0.9. The builds for Eclipse
> 3.0 don't work with Eclipse 2.1 (some required Eclipse plugins are
> missing). Hmm. Nice developer documentation :-) I think I'll build a
> more current version for Eclipse 2.1 myself in the next few days.

We really should release a new version. I don't have much time myself
however this week.
Daniel ?

I am currently working on a problem concerning paths and notification.
(When you do a svn commit (both using command line interface and
javahl), svn returns the relative paths of committed path but they are
not always relative to the current path ...)

Received on Fri Apr 16 08:09:31 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.