[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of Subclipse

From: McClain Looney <m_at_loonsoft.com>
Date: 2004-04-14 14:52:37 CEST

On Apr 14, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Jürgen Baier wrote:
> 1) When could I expect merge support? 6 Months? 1 Year?

i can only speak to the 3.0 branch, but merge/compare support there (in
the api merge and compare are joined at the hip), will not exist until
some time after the developer documentation is finished (currently the
docs are about a third done).

as always, patches are welcome :)

> 2) How active is the development for Subclipse? Any full-time
> developers?

a look at the subclipse commit logs shows ongoing development. i don't
believe there is anyone getting paid, though there are rumors of
collab.net being very interested in seeing this project completed (as
is the eclipse team at ibm).

> Currently the website doesn't look too promising: Subclipse 0.9 linked
> against Subversion 0.37, a month after the 1.0 release of Subversion.

the website is out of date, i believe latest windows builds are on 1.0,
linux/osx is up to 1.0.1. I make 3.0 releases quite regularly, and try
to track svn releases closely.

This is only my point of view, Cedric (or other 2.1 developers) can
fill in more detail.

McClain Looney
Received on Wed Apr 14 22:52:37 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.