On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Joshua Frankamp <frankamp_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd suggest posting to the list questions/plans so I or other can help
>> point you in the right direction.
>
> Thanks Mark. I think my first goal is to get existing functionality to
> work bound against the subversion 1.5 dependencies and get a release
> out. I see there are 10 open issues, with 5 defects and a couple
> patches. If I should go in that direction first, I'm open to it. I've
> also been reading through the patch svnant emails to the dev list, of
> which it appears there is only one from the past year.
>
> Questions:
>
> I see there are tags for svnant, but no tag for the latest release
> 1.1.RC2. Should I tag the trunk as 1.1.RC3 after I verify tests and
> move on? I'll need an anchor to start a branch to patch against the
> svnant1.1/subversion-1.4 series if something comes up later.
>
> Assuming I do that am I free to develop in the trunk toward subversion
> 1.5 dependencies?
I'd just start working on trunk towards fixing it with 1.5 and not
worry about the other stuff. It is trivial to make branches/tags
later if a need arises and you do not want to take on too much
initially as it might wind up discouraging you.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subclipse.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-09 13:28:07 CEST