"Alain Pannetier" <alain.m.pannetier@gmail.com> wrote on 07/19/2006
04:03:19 AM:
> Two points regarding the proposal of subclipse to Eclipse.org
>
> 1/ I was also expecting in the Description paragraph that you would
> emphasize the adherence of the existing works to the development
> practices and standards implemented and respected by Eclipse
> committers.
> Like
> - separation of ui and core plugins,
> - having a few internal package,
> - exporting an extension
> - help plugins
> Some of these can be differentiators for people who would be attached
> to this kind of argumentation.
Thanks. I will reevaluate the current proposal with your comments in
mind. I'd also like to work in that we have some community contributed
localizations. Part of why I did not go down this path to far is that the
proposal is ultimately about a new Eclipse project. While it will come
from the Subclipse code, I did not want to focus too much on what
Subclipse currently contains.
> 2/ One typo probably
>
> We believe that our proposal represents the better option for the
> Eclipse community.
>
> You probably mean "The best" or "a better".
I meant to write "the better". Is that grammatically incorrect? I mean
to say that our proposal is "the better" of the two proposals. Isn't that
right? I guess saying "best" just sounds a bit more arrogant than I
wanted, but you are probably right. I will look at it.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 19 14:48:07 2006