Hello Mark,
Best of luck and thx again for the hard work.
Two points regarding the proposal of subclipse to Eclipse.org
1/ I was also expecting in the Description paragraph that you would
emphasize the adherence of the existing works to the development
practices and standards implemented and respected by Eclipse
committers.
Like
- separation of ui and core plugins,
- having a few internal package,
- exporting an extension
- help plugins
Some of these can be differentiators for people who would be attached
to this kind of argumentation.
2/ One typo probably
We believe that our proposal represents the better option for the
Eclipse community.
You probably mean "The best" or "a better".
Kind regards,
On 7/18/06, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> wrote:
> I have not received a lot of comments recently and we are getting closer
> to final stages. Please comment soon if you want to be heard.
>
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/proposal/index.html
>
> I just added a paragraph to the end of the "History" section about why I
> think that JavaHL is important. Some of you are likely to agree/disagree
> strongly so please comment either way.
>
> Thanks
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 19 10:03:25 2006