On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 15:32 -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Ben Konrath <bkonrath@redhat.com> wrote on 05/15/2006 03:27:16 PM:
>
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 20:31 -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> >
> > > Finally, I did not want to make an svnClientAdapter download separate
> > > because I did not want people calling it svnClientAdapter 1.0.2 and
> > > considering it a release. I guess it is OK though, so I'll also do
> > > that.
> >
> > So svnClientAdapter is not released at the same time or is not the same
> > version number as subclipse? If this is the case, maybe there could be a
> > separate source release with a separate version number.
>
> We do not do any official releases for svnClientAdapter at all. That is
> why I include it in the tag I create for Subclipse. Almost all work for
> svnClientAdapter is based on Subclipse, so if it were to have releases,
> I'd have to make a new one everytime I make a change. It isn't worth it.
> If other projects want to use svnClientAdapter, they ought to be able to
> just decide on their own what version from our repository they want to use
> and pull the source accordingly.
Oh ok, then I made a mistake - I was under the impression that
svnClientAdapter was intended to be useful to other non-eclipse apps and
was released separately. So just ignore everything I said about
splitting out svnClientAdapter from the subclipse source zip.
Thanks, Ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 15 21:50:19 2006