Ben Konrath <bkonrath@redhat.com> wrote on 05/15/2006 03:27:16 PM:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 20:31 -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> > Finally, I did not want to make an svnClientAdapter download separate
> > because I did not want people calling it svnClientAdapter 1.0.2 and
> > considering it a release. I guess it is OK though, so I'll also do
that.
>
> So svnClientAdapter is not released at the same time or is not the same
> version number as subclipse? If this is the case, maybe there could be a
> separate source release with a separate version number.
We do not do any official releases for svnClientAdapter at all. That is
why I include it in the tag I create for Subclipse. Almost all work for
svnClientAdapter is based on Subclipse, so if it were to have releases,
I'd have to make a new one everytime I make a change. It isn't worth it.
If other projects want to use svnClientAdapter, they ought to be able to
just decide on their own what version from our repository they want to use
and pull the source accordingly.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 15 21:32:11 2006