RE: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse "switch" very slow compared to "svn switch" (From users list)
From: Irving, Dave <dave.irving_at_logicacmg.com>
Date: 2006-04-10 16:13:59 CEST
Mark Phippard wrote:
> I do not think there will be any "nasty" side effects. In
That's good to know - as I may use this "patch" locally :o)
> With Merge the problem was similar. After some merges you
Again, useful to know - thanks.
> I added the Refresh as a way to resolve these problems. In
I've just performed a switch whilst using my modified "un-refreshing"
Is there perhaps something that says "do a full re-build if the root
Basically, it seems that the refresh in SwitchUrlCommand isn't the root
> I think the real patch to this problem would be to take out
Yeah... Once I've solved my current problem, I'll hopefully find time to
> Mark
Dave
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.