Brock Janiczak <brockj@tpg.com.au> wrote on 03/07/2006 03:45:23 PM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > According to:
> >
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=116084
> >
> > This is still not API in 3.2. If we could make your code support both
3.1
> > and 3.2, I think it might be worth including.
> >
>
> yeah, I didn't realise i had two API requests in for synchronize
> classes. They only made the UI stuff API in 3.2
>
> I am busy with other stuff at the moment, but will be able to work on
> this in about two weeks time. It should be safe to use the internal API
> as it won't change for at least 6 months.
>
> btw, I have reviewed the line tracker patch and will commit it on the
> weekend. I had to make a few changes and need to test it a bit more.
> It still has trouble opening files that don't have an editor registered
> for their extension and have a content type of 'text' (looks to be a
> platform issue).
Thanks as always.
When the Commit Set stuff is done, I plan on doing a 1.1.0 release and
posting to a new update site. I figure we can use odd release numbers as
development releases so that people have to knowingly install them. When
we feel good about it, we can make a 1.2.0 release and then post that to
the old and new update site so that people can upgrade to it via the
automatic updates.
We can maintain 1.0.x indefinitely for Eclipse 3.0 users.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 7 21:53:05 2006