[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [Subclipse-dev] Dirty folder decorators behavior

From: Martin Letenay <mle_at_whitestein.com>
Date: 2005-09-29 15:56:45 CEST

> I am just following up on my last post.
> Even in the latest trunk I am not seeing unversioned files
> cause their parent to be decorated. Are you sure you do not
> have a prop-change on one of these folders?
> I do not think I would like the idea of this feature. If a
> dirty decorator is present, then I would expect the Revert
> option to always show me something. In the case of
> unversioned files, it wouldn't.
> On another topic ... I like the new comment headers you are
> doing for the license. I just wanted to point out that none
> of the files have an @author tag as the comment references.
> Should we just change the wording to refer to the repository
> for author information?

Ooops !

Sorry, you're of course right, there's not such behavior there.
It was my mistake ...

Regarding the license, I was aware of it and I planned to put the @author
tag there.
Unfortunatelly it seems I did not. Sorry Cedric ...

I should probably stop commiting past midnight, I'm making mistakes ...

Received on Thu Sep 29 23:56:45 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.