"Martin Letenay" <email@example.com> wrote on 08/24/2005 10:39:45 AM:
> Mark, Daniel,
> Since the 0.9.33 is on the way I can take a break from the
> view issues
> and refresh my mind with something new.
> If you don't mind I can take a look at the svnAnt code for a change.
> I was thinking about some minor code cleanup and plugging JavaSVN there.
> Now I've just noticed that Matt already plugged JavaSVN in in his patch
> might have less work.
> One other issue in the svnAnt I would like to improve are it's
> I took a brief look and it seems that the whole dependecny on
> is just one simple method call ...
> So I'd like to reduce the number of jars needed to be copied with
> by one ...
I think that Daniel might be trying to keep things stable for the 1.0
release. Perhaps he should create a 1.0.x branch?
The commons-lang dependency comes from svnClientAdapter. Feel free to try
to remove it. Everything will then benefit.
I would like to see JavaSVN added to the svnAnt distribution so that it
could work out of the box for most people.
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
Received on Thu Aug 25 00:52:36 2005