> > I agree.
> > I'll adapt the statusCommand code accordingly.
> >
> > What about that "mixed" mode ?
>
> I wasn't suggesting anything here. Are you saying, we could
> consider adding some way that even when you were using JavaHL
> as your adapter, it could use JavaSVN for this one status
> call? It is an interesting idea. I would prefer to wait on
> it a bit, but is something we should keep in mind.
> One problem I immediately see is for stuff like svn+ssh://
> you would really have to do both configurations that are
> needed. I think if we did go down this route the best thing
> would be to make a 4th adapter choice so that it was clear
> what we were doing.
>
> I will work on getting the svnClientAdapter changes I was
> rpeviously suggesting committed.
>
> Mark
It was just an idea.
I'm only using the http: protocol, so I often tend to forget the other ways
how to access svn server.
So it's questionable whether it is feasible in general.
For the time being we should go the way you proposed, I agree.
Martin
Received on Tue Aug 9 01:42:21 2005