[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: New Subclipse Release coming

From: Panagiotis Korros <panagiotis.korros_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-04-05 20:57:53 CEST

Commited in r1308.

On Apr 5, 2005 9:32 PM, Panagiotis Korros <panagiotis.korros@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Magnus and all,
> I am sorry about the big delay. I will commit my patch today.
>
> Regards,
>
> Panagiotis
>
> On Apr 5, 2005 5:53 PM, Mark Phippard <MarkP@softlanding.com> wrote:
> >
> > "Magnus Naeslund(w)" <mag@fbab.net> wrote on 04/05/2005 10:50:01 AM:
> >
> > >
> > > Mark Phippard said:
> > > > I had been waiting for Subversion 1.1.4 to come out. Now that it is,
> > I
> > > > will put together a Subclipse release today or tomorrow depending on
> > my
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > If you have something you plan on committing that you want in the
> > release,
> > > > please email me ASAP so I can wait for it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well maybe this time it's is too narrow, but sometime I would like to
> > > apply my "auto-add" functionality, but it hinges of of Panagiotis
> > > "auto-share" patch. I know my last combined patch is working "good
> > enough"
> > > since we're running it in production and test as we speak. Also I
> > think
> > > my combined patch (auto-add ontop of auto-share) actually have them
> > both
> > > working, but since I'm not entirely sure how auto-share should work I
> > > can't really say it's complete.
> > >
> > > But no-one has reviewed the code or answered the questions I had about
> > if
> > > I was doing stuff the right way (especially the gui<->core
> > connection).
> > > I know it scratches our itches, but I don't know if the code is up to
> > > Subclipses code standard.
> > >
> > > So when I get the patch OK:ed from you guys I need to either wait for
> > > Panagiotis patch to be applied so I can diff against that, or apply my
> > > patch first so that Panagiotis can rediff against that...
> >
> > I was hoping that Panagiotis would review it. Also, he has commit
> > authority so he can just commit both of them whenever he feels like it.
> > As
> > long as you both test that your patch does nothing to make Eclipse 3.0.x
> > stop working, I do not have any objections.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________________________
> > Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management
> > Services powered by MessageLabs.
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Take back the web http://www.getfirefox.com
>

-- 
Take back the web http://www.getfirefox.com
Received on Wed Apr 6 04:57:53 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.