Mark Phippard wrote:
>Daniel Serodio <dserodio@ec-corp.com.br> wrote on 12/23/2004 01:18:36 PM:
>
>
>
>>Any news on this bug? It's the feature I use the most in the CVS plugin,
>>
>>
>>and I
>>really want to migrate to Subversion...
>>
>>I understand some about Eclipse plugins, but I'm not familiar with
>>Subclipse's
>>internals. I'm willing to fix this bug, if someone can give me some
>>pointers.
>>
>>
>
>It is not a bug, the action has just not been implemented yet. The whole
>Synchronize action is still a work in progress and not to be used yet.
>
>In my opinion, our biggest mistake is that we do not just hide that menu
>option in our plugin.xml when we make our releases.
>
>I am working on this action, but the code is ugly so it is easy to get
>distracted to other tasks. Feel free to jump in if you want to try to
>implement it. There was a posting on the list a few weeks ago about what
>is left to do in Synchronize. This is the gist of it:
>
>"These are some of the issues that must be addressed:
>
>1. Add commit action where appropriate
>2. Add revert action where appropriate
>3. Add ignore action where appropriate
>4. Test and fix the update action
>5. Fix the synchronizer to correctly show locally deleted/missing
>resources
>6. Enhance the sync view decorator to show more info (e.g. switched or
>external resources, revision, authors, dates etc)
>7. Enhance the sync view to show property changes
>
>and some nice enhancements that would be welcomed:
>
>1. Add support for commit sets (Eclipse 3.1)
>2. Add more fine grained progress information.
>
>Any help would be welcomed!"
>
>So as this message states, feel free to jump in and knock off some of
>these items. You can just send your patches to this list and we will
>review them.
>
>Mark
>
>
I'll take a look at it. Is development taking place at the trunk or the
subclipse-3 branch?
[]'s
Daniel Serodio
Received on Fri Dec 24 06:00:58 2004