Re: A plea for a new version ...
> I realize that development on the Eclipse 2.x version of Subclipse is
> essentially dead. I do not disagree with this, it makes sense to develop
> for Eclipse 3 and the new API's.
> That being said, IBM's WebSphere Studio 5.x line is going to be with us
> a long time so it would be nice to have some updates to the Eclipse 2.x
> version. This is what I would like to see:
> 1) Incorporation of new JavaHL versions as appropriate to stay current
> with Subversion. I use Subclipse daily with a 1.1 server and have no
> troubles. But what would happen if I was accessing a fsfs repository via
> file:// ? I am not sure. On Windows, I think I would have trouble. It
> seems like a fair number of people in the TortoiseSVN community are
> considering using a file share to have a shared repository without using
> Apache or SVN. fsfs allows you to do this fairly easily and it is a nice
> option for a small team.
> 2) Minor updates where possible. I am fairly happy with what the Eclipse
> 2.x version provides. It would be great if the decorator performance
> enhancements could be backported. Some of the other enhancements would be
> nice, but I do not consider any of them essential.
> 3) Bug fixes as approriate. None come to mind.
I agree but it needs time to do so. We probably need a volunteer here.
Received on Tue Oct 12 16:49:00 2004
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev