as an aside, i like having tests in a separate eclipse project too
(keeps things like junit libs out of the real project stuff)...
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:44:26 +0100, Cédric Chabanois
<cchabanois@no-log.org> wrote:
> No, you are right. We should better test svnant and svnClientAdapter
> separatly.
>
> I will add some more tests to svnClientAdapter
>
> Cédric
>
>
>
> > The tests you have in svnant are great (really like how you populate
> > the working copy). The only things i don't like is that they they are
> > testing both svnant and SnvClientAdapter at the same time and it
> > requires you to have svnant checked out.
> >
> > Let me know what you want me to do about the test i added. It is
> > quite trivial (copy some asserts) to update the existing test in svnant.
> >
> > Cédric Chabanois wrote:
> >
> >> Actually tests are in svnant/src/testcases
> >> See SvnTest.java file
> >>
> >> It uses the build.xml file in svnant/test/svn/build.xml
> >>
> >> Cédric
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
--
McClain Looney
m@loonsoft.com
Received on Sun Oct 3 00:12:22 2004