[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: r969-r970

From: CÚdric Chabanois <cchabanois_at_no-log.org>
Date: 2004-10-02 14:44:26 CEST

No, you are right. We should better test svnant and svnClientAdapter
separatly.

I will add some more tests to svnClientAdapter

CÚdric

> The tests you have in svnant are great (really like how you populate
> the working copy). The only things i don't like is that they they are
> testing both svnant and SnvClientAdapter at the same time and it
> requires you to have svnant checked out.
>
> Let me know what you want me to do about the test i added. It is
> quite trivial (copy some asserts) to update the existing test in svnant.
>
> CÚdric Chabanois wrote:
>
>> Actually tests are in svnant/src/testcases
>> See SvnTest.java file
>>
>> It uses the build.xml file in svnant/test/svn/build.xml
>>
>> CÚdric
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Sat Oct 2 22:44:26 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.