Pardon my budging in from the peanut gallery...
McClain Looney wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 December 2003 11:50 am, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> 
>>Ah, ok.  Was it a bugfix?  (Looks at svn logs...) r265, perhaps?  What
>>revision is release 0.8.1 based on?
> 
> 
> the ssl thing was a bugfix
> 
> 
>>I'd like to try this out... will there be a 0.8.2 release anytime soon?
>>Or perhaps I should use a specific test-release, or just try building
>>everything myself?
> 
> 
> you can grab r375 if you're running linux and m5, if not, the latest win32 
> build available for eclipse m5 is at www.loonsoft.com/downloads. the latest 
> eclipse 2.1 build is the stock 0.81.
Unless something is mislabeled there, there is no M5 build for windows. 
  Just two linux builds and a panther build.
> i'm not privy to the release schedule, so I can't say when the next release 
> will be.
> 
> alternately, you can d/l and compile it yourself if you like.
I tried recently and again last night with the eclipse 3 branch but was 
having a lot of problems getting the project recognized.  I read the 
paper by Sunghun Kim & Guozheng Ge posted here recently but it seemed to 
be missing important details about the subclipse3 branch.
I get errors on all the required plugins and the extension point (in 
core at least) for example.  I tried adding the jars from these plugins 
in ECLIPSE_HOME to the libraries in build path properties but this had 
no effect.  I'm new to plugin development but have done this a few times 
before and not had this problem - sorry if I've asked a bone-headed 
newbie question.
Notes:
- I assume the correct start is to check out branches/subclipse-3/core, 
branches/subsclipse-3/core-windows, and branches/subclipse-3/ui as well 
as trunk/svnClientAdapter as projects (using subclipse .81 IIRC)
- I noticed after it was too late to try again that I had done the whole 
thing under M4 instead of M5, but am I right that this should not have 
caused the problems I was seeing?  Could the api have changed so 
significantly between M4/5?
Geoff
Received on Thu Dec 11 11:31:51 2003