[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue tracker housecleaning: SVN-1722

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 01:39:15 +0200

On 17.10.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
>>> On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
>>>>> On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>>>> Which reminds me: it'd be nice to set up a buildbot to run the build and
>>>>>> test process under Python 3. Any committer can edit the buildbot
>>>>>> scripts[1], but the question is which of the buildbot slaves has Python 3
>>>>>> installed?
>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-macosx-local-python3
>>>>> Been there, done that, bought the DVD.
>>>> Why are svnadmin_tests 69 and tree_conflict_tests 26 passing on that
>>>> bot? They (currently) fail under python3.
>>> I don't know. It's possible, I suppose, that the activation of the
>>> python3 virtual environment has no effect on the test driver. It might
>>> not be a bad idea to have the tests print the Python version in the
>>> summary and possibly in the log of every test case.
>> What's the value of $(PYTHON) in Makefile? That's what the «check» target uses.
> Yep, apparently that's the bug ... I'm testing script changes now, along
> with r1868566 for good measure.

I've set up this:

It will build and test the core libraries and swig-py bindings with
Python 3 on the swig-py3 branch.

I hope ... build #0 running as we speak.

-- Brane
Received on 2019-10-18 01:39:18 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.