[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue tracker housecleaning: SVN-1722

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:46:03 +0200

On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
>> On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
>>>> On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>>> Which reminds me: it'd be nice to set up a buildbot to run the build and
>>>>> test process under Python 3. Any committer can edit the buildbot
>>>>> scripts[1], but the question is which of the buildbot slaves has Python 3
>>>>> installed?
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-macosx-local-python3
>>>>
>>>> Been there, done that, bought the DVD.
>>> Why are svnadmin_tests 69 and tree_conflict_tests 26 passing on that
>>> bot? They (currently) fail under python3.
>> I don't know. It's possible, I suppose, that the activation of the
>> python3 virtual environment has no effect on the test driver. It might
>> not be a bad idea to have the tests print the Python version in the
>> summary and possibly in the log of every test case.
> What's the value of $(PYTHON) in Makefile? That's what the «check» target uses.

Yep, apparently that's the bug ... I'm testing script changes now, along
with r1868566 for good measure.

-- Brane
Received on 2019-10-17 23:46:05 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.