[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue tracker housecleaning: SVN-1722

From: Nathan Hartman <hartman.nathan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:47:57 -0400

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:40 AM Julian Foad <julian_at_foad.me.uk> wrote:
> Your analysis is good enough for me. I don't need to double check the details.
> I'd say, add a short summary and a link to that email, and close it.

Will do...

FWIW I tested the SVN-1722 reproduction script on 1.13.0-rc1 earlier
today and all is well.

Is it sensible to add a regression test? If so, should I wait until
after the Py3 work in progress on the test suite?

Received on 2019-10-16 06:54:05 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.