On 2019/10/16 10:36, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote on Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 16:19:46 +0900:
>> On 2019-10-15 07:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote on Sun, 13 Oct 2019 04:01 +00:00:
>>>> On 2019/10/13 7:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Also, what about the svnadmin_tests.py patch you posted upthread? Is
>>> there a reason not to go ahead and commit it to trunk? (and even nominate
>>> it for backport in 1.13.x/STATUS)
>>
>> I think that is no probrem.
>
> Let me elaborate. By my reckoning, «make check» on trunk has a false positive
> when ${PYTHON} is python3; and furthermore, python2 will reach EOL during the
> lifetime of the 1.13 branch; therefore, we should fix the false positive and
> backport the fix to supported branches. What's your view?
I agree with you, because I think we should publish at least one relase
support Python 3, so that we can remove the sentence "Note that Python 3.x
is not supported and most likely won't work." in "Dependencies in Detail"
section of INSTALL file, before EOL of Python 2.
Cheers,
--
Yasuhito FUTATSUKI <futatuki_at_poem.co.jp>
Received on 2019-10-16 06:41:44 CEST