Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, 10 Oct 2019 21:12 +00:00:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> >
> > Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 16:28:21 -0400:
> > > If we have to pull that item out (not saying we do yet, just IF), then that
> > > leaves us with no Python tasks. I'd like to have something Python-related
> > > on the list because there's a good chance that a 700+ member university
> > > hackathon will have some Python programmers. Any other suggested
> > > Python tasks we could add?
> >
> > Something in the test harness. For example, make it easier to run «make check»
> > with client version ≠ server version, to actually test on-the-wire
> > compatibility. Or use trunk client and trunk server, but make them both expose
> > fewer capabilities, to test that compatibility codepaths.
>
> Has any work been done on making the test harness Py3 compatible?
From autogen.sh to 'make check', all steps pass with PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3.
Julian, do you have any release.py tasks to suggest?
Received on 2019-10-10 23:55:59 CEST