Re: svn commit: r1867063 - /subversion/site/staging/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html

Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> My reading of consensus is that we changed "three +1s" to "two +1s" for non-LTS
> lines, but didn't _increase_ the bar in any way.

Agreed.

> However, as written, this change could be taken as saying that the rule
> of "one +1 and one +0" does not apply to bindings changes to non-LTS
> lines. (It's not clear whether the "preceded by a bold paragraph" unary
> operator has a higher or lower precedence than the binary "paragraph
> juxtaposition" operator.) Clarify, please?

Thanks for your precision, again! Does http://svn.apache.org/r1867110
sufficiently clarify the ambiguity?

- Julian
Received on 2019-09-18 12:01:21 CEST