[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1867063 - /subversion/site/staging/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:34:47 +0000

julianfoad_at_apache.org wrote on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:49 +00:00:
> +++ subversion/site/staging/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html Tue Sep 17 14:49:51 2019
> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ it.</p>
>
> <p><b>For a non-LTS ("regular") release line</b></p>
>
> -<p>A change is approved if it receives one +1 vote and no vetoes. (Only
> +<p>A change is approved if it receives two +1s and no vetoes. (Only
> binding votes count; see above.)</p>
>
> <p><b>For an LTS release line</b></p>

My reading of consensus is that we changed "three +1s" to "two +1s" for non-LTS
lines, but didn't _increase_ the bar in any way.

However, as written, this change could be taken as saying that the rule
of "one +1 and one +0" does not apply to bindings changes to non-LTS
lines. (It's not clear whether the "preceded by a bold paragraph" unary
operator has a higher or lower precedence than the binary "paragraph
juxtaposition" operator.) Clarify, please?

Cheers,

Daniel
Received on 2019-09-17 18:35:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.