[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 2.0

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:34:21 +0200

On 25.06.2019 19:16, Thomas Singer wrote:
>> I don't want to rain on anyone's parade but here's some food for
>> thought. The only valid reason to call anything 2.0 is if, and only if,
>> we decide to break backwards compatibility in some area.
>
> I disagree. It is quite common use to name something 2.0 if it has
> serious improvements over 1.x.

That's marketing, not software development. :)

-- Brane
Received on 2019-06-25 23:34:25 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.