[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 2.0

From: Thomas Singer <thomas.singer_at_syntevo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:16:51 +0200

> I don't want to rain on anyone's parade but here's some food for
> thought. The only valid reason to call anything 2.0 is if, and only if,
> we decide to break backwards compatibility in some area.

I disagree. It is quite common use to name something 2.0 if it has
serious improvements over 1.x. 

-- 
Best regards,
Thomas Singer
=============
syntevo GmbH
Received on 2019-06-25 19:17:11 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.