On 14.10.2018 15:48, Nikita Slyusarev wrote:
> 04.08.2018, 17:47, "Nikita Slyusarev" <nslus_at_yandex-team.com>:
>> For everyone's sanity I'd better not only bump the thread, but also
>> resend the patch and the log message I had prepared back then.
>> 14.07.2018, 19:04, "Nikita Slyusarev" <nslus_at_yandex-team.com
>> Correctly handle existing parent directories when performing
>> repos-to-wc copy.
>> * subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c
>> (repos_to_wc_copy): If add_parents flag is set and destination
>> directory exists, but is unversioned, put it under version
>> control. Wc-to-wc
>> copy behaves this way, and so should repos-to-wc copy do.
>> * subversion/tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py
>> copy_make_parents_wc_wc): Check behaviour with dst directory
>> for both repo-to-wc and wc-to-wc test cases.
> Hello, guys, any hope to get this reviewed?
Hey. Thanks for the nudge.
I have just one comment: The two new test scenarios you should be split
into their own test cases. Not only is it bad practice to make a test
case test more than one scenario, it also defeats parallel test execution.
Received on 2018-10-14 16:17:39 CEST