[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: msguniq in po-update.sh

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:25:40 +0200

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 11:06:40PM +0200, Mattias Engdegrd wrote:
> Sorry about messing up the build with my ill-considered merge of r1841318
> (sv.po). Instead of attempting to merge from 1.11.x, which is what caused the
> duplicated msgids, I should just have copied the entire file from that branch
> and be done with it. That was just careless on my part.
> However, r1841716 and r1841717 (adding msguniq to po-update.sh and running
> it) may have been made in haste. The latter reformatted the entire file,
> making it impossible to see what had actually changed; I had to write a
> script to normalise the strings in order to make sense of that change, and
> the line history is completely gone.
> I'll replace sv.po in trunk with that in 1.11.x, which does not contain any
> duplicated msgids. Would you agree to revert r1841716, on the grounds that
> having msguniq as part of the script is somewhat invasive and dangerous? Not
> only does it reformat the file, but I'm far from sure what it does with
> duplicated msgids, and whether that is the right course of action in all
> cases. Surely human intervention is safer.

Sure. Whichever solution works for you is fine for me.

I just committed what seemed like a working solution to allow me to
make progress beyond a build failure. The use of msguniq was suggested
in a source code comment in gettext close to the crash I ran into,
so I tried it and it resolved the issue at hand for me.

But I am not involved in translations and am unaware of the finer
points that need consideration. I am fine with you reverting my
changes and providing a better solution. (I won't have time to
revert those changes myself over the coming days, sorry.)
Received on 2018-09-23 23:25:56 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.