On 28.12.2017 19:17, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 25.12.2017 14:20, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 12:21:46PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>> So, this is the result. It also covers the changes
>>> skipped by release.py (first block of 5 entries).
>>>
>>> I will try to reformulate & group the list and then
>>> commit them to CHANGES by Wednesday.
>>
>> Thanks! This helps a lot with completing the changelog.
>>
>> However, I have some mild concerns.
>
> <snip>
>
>> I am not going to go through all of these now. I suppose you already
>> understand the point I'm trying to make.
>> We can still do a final review at the end and toss out entries which aren't
>> really needed, but please don't just add new entries without considering
>> and weighing each of them. Please carefully check each entry.
>>
>
> For the ones I now added to the CHANGES list, I did check
> each entry. The point of my initial post was to "save" /
> document the intermediate state after filtering through
> over 200 candidates, combining related ones etc.
>
> -- Stefan^2.
As of r1819491, the CHANGES for 1.10 should be complete.
The file might use some sorting / grouping and certainly a review.
-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2017-12-29 14:42:49 CET