On 25/11/2017 16:12, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:42:05PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out the sparse
>> definition of a working copy, or in other words some initial dumb viewspec
>> Testing this on a test working copy with
>> $ svn switch --list \SharpSvn\trunk
> Has a new 'svn viewspec' been subcommand considered?
> 'switch --list' reminds me of our 'switch --relocate' mistake
> from the past ;)
Indeed it was. FWIW I agree there are good arguments for a new viewspec
The alternative would be to use "svn list --generate-viewspec" and "svn
switch/checkout --use-viewspec < viewspecfile" or something like this.
The obvious downside would be that one subcommand would be used to
generate the viewspec while another one would be used to apply it. I
think Bert brought up other arguments against adding it to "svn list".
Received on 2017-11-26 23:50:31 CET