[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Sparse checkouts suggestion

From: Paul Hammant <paul_at_hammant.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 06:37:59 -0400

>
>
> I'm not sure if you agree or not, but I think the fine-grained globbing
> include/exclude capability as Perforce has it. is required.
>
>
> "Required" implies "working copy format change". That's always hard.
>
> "Optional" means "get some of the features sooner."
>

I'm a big advocate for "ship-it now, add features later".

I'll try again:

"I'm not sure if you agree or not, but I think the fine-grained globbing
include/exclude capability as Perforce has it, is *ultimately* required."
Received on 2017-09-21 12:38:03 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.