[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Sparse checkouts suggestion

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:22:05 +0200

On 21.09.2017 12:08, Paul Hammant wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> if /foo does not exist at checkout time -- and if we'd want /* to mean
> "include anything new that appears in the repository", not "include
> everything else that's in the repository at the time of the checkout".
>
>
> I'm not sure if you agree or not, but I think the fine-grained
> globbing include/exclude capability as Perforce has it. is required.

"Required" implies "working copy format change". That's always hard.

"Optional" means "get some of the features sooner."

Take your pick. :)

-- Brane
Received on 2017-09-21 12:22:11 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.