[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: translations

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:48:28 +0100

On 09.02.2017 14:16, Andreas Stieger wrote:
> You would not use the .pot but the .po, so as to not loose existing translations.
> For other translations: setting them up in Pootle, I did not want to presume that other po maintainers would want to do that.
>
> Pootle has automation opportunities of scanning the code base, have not explored.
>
> Is that something we want to kick off for the next release?

It wouldn't hurt to bring Subversion into the 20th century, at least as
far as translations are concerned. :)

I can help with any scripting but can't promise to lead this effort ...
NoTimeTM.

-- Brane
Received on 2017-02-09 14:48:32 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.