On 5/16/2016 13:14, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 16 May 2016 at 13:43, Stefan <luke1410_at_posteo.de> wrote:
>> On 5/16/2016 11:42, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On 15 May 2016 at 03:02, Stefan <luke1410_at_gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> On 5/15/2016 01:13, Stefan wrote:
>>>>> [[[
>>>>> Add a troubleshooting section to 1.9 to help users tracing down problems
>>>>> related to proxies when locking/unlocking multiple files.
>>>>>
>>>>> * docs/release-notes/1.9.html
>>>>> (troubleshooting): Add new section including http-pipelining issue
>>>>> description.
>>>>> ]]]
>>>> Small correction to patchnotes:
>>>>
>>>> [[[
>>>> Add a troubleshooting section to 1.9 to help users tracing down problems
>>>> related to proxies when locking/unlocking multiple files.
>>>>
>>>> * docs/release-notes/1.9.html
>>>> (troubleshooting): Add new section including http-pipelining issue
>>>> description.
>>>> (news): Add link to new troubleshooting section.
>>>> ]]]
>>>>
>>> I think it's better to use term "HTTP pipelining" instead of
>>> "http-pipelining" on the website. Another wording suggestion: replace
>>> ".. protocols/applications involved in processing http-pipelining."
>>> with something like ".. protocols/applications involved in processing
>>> pipelined HTTP requests."
>> Thanks for the review Ivan, attached patch incorporates your changes and
>> also changes the section name (http-pipeline-issue ->
>> http-pipelining-issue).
>>
> Thanks for fixing that, but title still uses term 'http-pipelining":
> +<h3>Lock/Unlock errors related to http-pipelining
> + <a class="sectionlink" href="#http-pipelining-issue"
> + title="Link to this section">¶</a>
> +</h3>
Good spot. Fixed with the attached patch.
Regards,
Stefan
Received on 2016-05-16 13:24:49 CEST