[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Handling PROPFIND in mod_dav_svn (was: Re: Issue with browsing a SVN 1.9.2, schema 7, packed, repository)

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:37:55 +0300

On 15 January 2016 at 09:26, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Evgeny Kotkov wrote on Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 18:40:11 +0300:
>> Not quite sure on how do we continue from here.
> Well, it isn't consensus, but there's an old fallback we can use:
> pick an agreed-upon third party and let him decide.
> So let's ask a mod_dav/mod_dav_svn dev for his opinion and do what he says.
I am not a mod_dav developer, but I've been hacking on mod_dav_svn for
quite a while now.

In my opinion we should start reimplemeting mod_dav in mod_dav_svn
like we already did with implementing our own HTTPv2 protocol instead
of DAV and move forward. As far as I remember we discussed this
approach with Ben Reser two years ago on SVN Hackathon in Berlin and
he said that this might be good idea.

Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2016-01-15 18:38:19 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.