Re: NFS performance regression in 1.9

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:40:35 +0000

Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_gmail.com> writes:

> Test time in seconds (two runs) Svn version
> 739, 731 1.8.15
> 1068, 1071 1.9.3
> 802, 805 1.9.x+r1710167

That corresponds to my figures as far as I recall. The reason 1.9 is
slower than 1.8 is that 1.9 makes the pristines read-only and the extra
chmods() more than cancel out any wc.db improvements.

-- 
Philip Martin
WANdisco

Received on 2016-01-11 11:40:42 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Evgeny Kotkov: "Re: svn commit: r1723900 - in /subversion/branches/fs-node-api/subversion: include/svn_fs.h libsvn_fs/fs-loader.c libsvn_fs/fs-loader.h libsvn_fs/node_compat.c libsvn_fs_fs/node.c tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c"
Previous message: Bert Huijben: "RE: svn commit: r1723900 - in /subversion/branches/fs-node-api/subversion: include/svn_fs.h libsvn_fs/fs-loader.c libsvn_fs/fs-loader.h libsvn_fs/node_compat.c libsvn_fs_fs/node.c tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c"
In reply to: Julian Foad: "Re: NFS performance regression in 1.9"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]