On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jamessan_at_apache.org [mailto:jamessan_at_apache.org]
> > Sent: dinsdag 5 januari 2016 05:59
> > To: commits_at_subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: svn commit: r1723003 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
> >
> > Author: jamessan
> > Date: Tue Jan 5 04:58:36 2016
> > New Revision: 1723003
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1723003&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * STATUS: Nominate r1721488.
> >
> > Modified:
> > subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
> >
> > Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
> > URL:
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1723
> > 003&r1=1723002&r2=1723003&view=diff
> > ==========================================================
> > ====================
> > --- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original)
> > +++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Tue Jan 5 04:58:36 2016
> > @@ -122,6 +122,13 @@ Candidate changes:
> > Votes:
> > +1: jamessan
> >
> > + * r1721488, r1721648
> > + Enable building bindings with SWIG >= 3.0.6
> > + Justification:
> > + Enable building bindings with SWIG 3.x
> > + Votes:
> > + +1: jamessan
>
> I think this nomination needs another addition and/or a backport branch.
Yeah, I noticed the backport-conflicts failure. danielsh made some
changes in trunk to fail if --with-swig is given but swig isn't found,
which haven't been backported.
I'll revisit that tonight.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan_at_apache.org>
Received on 2016-01-05 13:48:39 CET