On 17 Sep 2015 8:56 pm, "Greg Stein" <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>> And I wonder why the people who're doing the least work on this
>>> migration have the most to say about not wasting time with
>> Speaking for myself only, it is because I am not "in the room" with the
rest of you so cannot tell if the migration is going to happen no matter
what, or if it is going to get delayed again due to these trivialities. As
long as you all have the energy to see this through, I certainly do not
want to suggest you should not fix all of the trivialities that you
desire. I just do not want the moment to pass again and have people go
back home and move on to other things.
>> So my goal is just to say an imperfect migration is better than the
> And Branko: what does it matter what we say? People can still put their
time into anything they want.
Of course it matters. I'm just trying to gently hint at the discrepancy
between our "release when it's ready" mantra and this sudden urgency to
migrate the issue tracker yesterday. If we waited for 5 years we may as
well wait the couple extra days to get the details right.
Received on 2015-09-18 04:20:43 CEST