Re: Migrating Subversion issues to ...

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
>
>...

> And I wonder why the people who're doing the least work on this
>> migration have the most to say about not wasting time with "trivialities".
>>
>
> Speaking for myself only, it is because I am not "in the room" with the
> rest of you so cannot tell if the migration is going to happen no matter
> what, or if it is going to get delayed again due to these trivialities. As
> long as you all have the energy to see this through, I certainly do not
> want to suggest you should not fix all of the trivialities that you
> desire. I just do not want the moment to pass again and have people go
> back home and move on to other things.
>
> So my goal is just to say an imperfect migration is better than the status
> quo.
>

Exactly.

And Branko: what does it matter what we say? People can still put their
time into anything they want.

-g
Received on 2015-09-17 20:56:18 CEST